Ron Paul, Founding Father Material....

The Revolution: A Manifesto: A review by Scott Horton

2008-04-20T18:36:00.000-07:00

The Revolution: A Manifesto by Rep. Ron Paul M.D.

Read this book!

I’ve just finished Ron Paul’s The Revolution: A Manifesto, and am once again floored by Dr. Paul’s ability to identify the most important issues facing this country and explain their libertarian solutions in “honest, direct language,” as George Carlin would say.

In seven concise chapters, heavy with notable quotes from the founders, American historical figures, social researchers and Austrian economists, Dr. Paul destroys the myths of governmental benevolence and benefit on nearly every issue of importance for the present and future of this country.

He begins, of course, with foundational explanations of natural rights and the limits placed on the general government by the constitution which allows its existence. Paul then excoriates the government and explains the solution to its problems of empire, war, terrorism, conscription, violations of the Bill of Rights, spying, torture, the drug wars, healthcare, the welfare state, regulatory state, managed trade and the destruction of the American economy at the hands of the Federal Reserve system. He points out that the differences in the positions of the major parties and politicians are nearly meaningless as our country becomes a de facto one-party state under the centrist Democrats and neoconservative-controlled Republicans. They fight all day about meaningless details while we descend into tyranny.

Dr. Paul, whose steadfast opposition to warfare in the U.S. Congress extends back to his first terms in office in the 1970s, makes his standard case that rather than leading to some abstract “national greatness,” empire, in fact, weakens America. He says the cost of maintaining our empire is nearly a trillion dollars a year and that we just can’t afford it. Paul maintains that rather than protecting our freedom, war is nearly as destructive to our society as those of the people we wage them against. War leads to unchecked executive power and the destruction of our most highly valued liberty. Paul denounces our government’s policy of “preemptive” aggressive war as always morally and consequentially wrong and never justified. He also explains the anti-imperialist legacy of the Old Right and the antiwar sentiments of the more thoughtful leaders of the middle-to-New Right such as Russell Kirk, Richard Weaver, and Robert Nisbet. Paul explains that there is nothing conservative about waging war; it undermines every principle that conservatives claim to cherish (i.e.: the Constitution, the rule of law, family values, free markets, fiscal restraint.)

Paul thrashes the War Party over the subject of the next aggressive war on the horizon: Iran. He reminds us that he’s been correct for years in saying there was no evidence of a secret nuclear weapons program in Iran as all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies confirmed in their National Intelligence Estimate last fall and shows clearly that to this administration, as with their invasion of Iraq, the agenda is war and any excuse or varied combination of excuses will do.

Terrorism, the current excuse for our world empire, he explains, is not an enemy, but a strategy employed by enemies. People in occupied countries, Muslim or otherwise, have used this tactic to try to force the democratic societies which occupy them to withdraw their combat forces due to the expense of the predictable overreaction. He quotes intelligence beat journalist James Bamford’s reporting of Ayman al Zawahiri’s stated goal of trapping us in the Middle East to give us a “desert Vietnam” - to bleed us dry and force us out as the Regan administration helped them do to the Russians in the 1980s. This being the case, Paul concludes further invasions and occupations of their countries is exactly the wrong policy to follow. It is the founders’ foreign policy of peace, commerce and honest friendship which best protects Americans from terrorism. (In this section, Paul quotes former CIA counter-terrorism agents Michael Scheuer and Philip Giraldi from my interviews of them for Antiwar Radio.)

Paul says we should demand the immediate repeal of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and insist on the protection of habeas corpus for all detainees unless the most immediate circumstances on the battlefield prevent it and that no American should ever be held by the military and subjected to torture as was José Padilla. He has introduced legislation in Congress to ensure those very things, among others, in the American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007.
Paul says that torture is always wrong and should never be tolerated for one second by the proud residents of a free society no matter what excuse those with power can conjure.
Paul also makes an eloquent case against conscription, calling it “slavery” and quoting Daniel Webster and Ronald Reagan to make the case that the draft contradicts the very premise of a free society, the constitution forbids it and that it should never be allowed in this country ever again.

He explains in detail how the administration has told lie after lie in order to justify their blatantly unconstitutional, unnecessary and illegal spying on Americans.

Economist Paul also explains his moral and practical opposition to managed trade organizations like NAFTA and the WTO, since they are unconstitutional transfers of Congress’ delegated powers and they actually sanction trade wars, require our Congress to raise taxes when they feel like it and otherwise interrupt peaceful trade. He points out that nothing new needs to be done to have free trade with other countries, all the government has to do is stop interfering. Presto, no tariffs, no subsidies.

It should be no surprise that a free market fundamentalist like Paul opposes all foreign aid and “restructuring” of other countries’ economies though the IMF and the World Bank, whose proclaimed purpose is to help the poor, when all they do is prop up governments that the locals oppose, distort and disrupt local markets and generally impoverish those who are supposedly being helped.

In The Revolution, as on the House floor, Paul takes a heroic stand against the federal government’s war on drugs and the entire policy in general. It is the creation of the black market by the congress and state legislatures which creates the environment in which murder, extortion and gang wars prevail, he explains. He gives special attention to the long history of frauds perpetrated by government in order to criminalize marijuana possession and sale. It was simply racist bigotry against Mexicans and a desire to persecute them which motivated the early American drug warriors. Their legacy is one of lives destroyed not by drugs, but by the state in its post-constitutional, “we own you and will decide what’s good for you” role it now plays in our society.

In the book Paul brings up the issue of race in terms of a limited national government, the unfair prosecution and sentencing of minorities in the drug wars and in terms of the impossibly burdensome regulatory state. The solution, he maintains, is a belief in individualism and a willingness of people to enforce their rights from the bottom up rather than looking to Washington DC. He explains how government serves only to divide us more even when attempting to ameliorate the problems of the past.

Paul also explains how government drives up the cost of healthcare for everyone and how the current welfare state is simply unaffordable and unsustainable by any measure. He explains how government interventions have led us to our current crisis and how real laissez-faire - not corporatist or socialist - reforms would fix the problems.

Another example of government failure cited is the current state of public education in this country. While not calling for abolition of all public schools, Paul does demand we get rid of the federal Department of Education and also explains how incredible amounts of resources are wasted into oblivion by the bureaucrats in ways that would never happen at private schools, making a strong case that parents could afford many more choices in education without the oppressive tax burdens they carry and that they would be well served to seek education outside the strictures of the state. Always tying political questions back to individual liberty, Paul also asks a basic question almost unheard of in polite company: why should anyone be forced to pay for the education of another and particularly when that person disagrees with the slant of the instruction? As just one example of the direction DC is leading us, Paul points out a little noticed but obviously dangerous move by the pharmaceutical companies and the national government to give mandatory “mental health” exams to all school children in order to force many millions more of them to take psychotropic drugs at the threat of removal from their parents. He rightly complains that even 20 years ago the people of this country would have been absolutely outraged. Maybe it’s the Prozac.

Dr. Paul also excoriates the modern regulatory state and explains how it makes us all poorer in order to benefit those who are already rich. Paul sticks up for the individual and his property rights against all, the rich, the poor or anyone else’s attempts to separate him from it with force - personally or through the state. It is our free economy, not government intervention which has made us so prosperous. Paul’s argument is nowhere close to an apologia for big business. It is they who have pushed all along for the governmental cartelization and regulation of business. The state is the mechanism by which those connected to its power can stifle competition and socialize their costs onto the rest of society. Questions of environmental pollution are one of Paul’s favorite examples of the failures of regulation, and for good reason. Really, no EPA is necessary - to protect the victims of the crime. Pollution can be handled simply by protecting people’s basic property rights with local courts. In fact, the purpose of the EPA is to protect the polluters from competition first and the consequences of polluting the environment second by claiming “public” ownership of the affected area (the air, bodies of water, etc.) and then providing immunity to those politically connected corporations who are within the “guidelines” they set for themselves. The right of the average guy to seek redress in a local court is then circumvented by the regulation of the executive branch. The explanation of why this is so, contained in The Revolution, should be enough to educate even the most pointy headed of your liberal and leftist friends.

Paul, a supposed student, but really an Austrian school economist in his own right, also gives a concise explanation of the criminal Federal Reserve System which robs the poor to benefit the bankers and merchants of death. Inflation, Paul explains, is a hidden tax, one that hurts the poor, working and retired people most for the benefit of these war-mongering plutocrats. They try to make the system seem too mysterious for the average guy to understand but it’s not. Stealing is stealing. The central bank causes the booms and busts they claim to “smooth out” with their process of artificially inflating the supply of money, causing bubbles of malinvestment in the market and setting us up for recessions. The popular line that “we the people,” through “our” Congress, use the state’s regulation to protect us from the “excesses” of capitalism must be the greatest line of bull fed to a population since the Aztec Flower Wars. Again, the light shed by Paul provides clarity to a subject extremely important and yet opaque to the people most affected.
Dr. Paul ends the book with a celebration of the varied millions who’ve rallied around his campaign and a call for those of us who love liberty to stand up for ourselves and put our out-of-control empire back in its place.

The joy I feel knowing that millions will eventually read this concise libertarian primer just makes me want to celebrate.

The heroic Ron Paul has done it again.

Scott Horton

John McCain thinks I'm none too bright

2008-02-22T08:20:00.000-08:00

John McCain paid Townhall to send me this plea for funds. He thinks that if he makes conservative noises I'll overlook his record and vote for him like a good sheep. But then again the specter of the wolves (Hillary or Obama) is so very terrifying, who can bear it? Perhaps I actually can see myself voting for McCain. What I can't see however, is just who it is that will be holding a gun to my head to bring about that act of madness.

My Friends,

I am writing to you because we must begin to unite as party and prepare for the upcoming election in November. If I am so fortunate as to be the Republican nominee for president, I will stand on my conservative convictions and offer Americans a clearly conservative approach to governing. But my friends, I cannot succeed in this endeavor without the support of dedicated conservatives like you. And today, I write to ask for your support.

Will you join my campaign today by making a generous contribution? We will have a hard-fought battle against either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, and I know that by joining together, our party will prevail on Election Day.

Earlier this month, Senators Clinton and Obama raised over $10 million online for their respective campaigns in just a few short days. I know that I must take the time now to replenish my campaign's funds to prepare for what will undoubtedly be the most expensive campaign for president in our history. That is why I ask you to make an urgent contribution of $25, $50, $100, $250, $500 or more today.

This election is going to be about big things, not small things. And I intend to fight as hard as I can to ensure that our shared conservative principles prevail.

Senators Clinton and Obama want to increase the size of the federal government, raise your taxes, and withdraw our forces from Iraq based on an arbitrary timetable designed for political expediency. I intend to reduce the size of the federal government, cut your taxes and win this war. I have had the distinct honor of serving our great country for many decades and with your support, I will be able to serve her for a little while longer.

I am proud to have come to public office as a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution. My friends, twenty-five years later, I am still proud to be a conservative and it is my greatest hope that you will join me in this campaign today. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John McCain

P.S. If I am so fortunate as to be the Republican nominee for president, I intend to lead our party to victory in November guided by our shared conservative principles. The upcoming battle for the White House will be the most expensive ever and your immediate contribution of $50 or more will help our campaign raise the funds necessary to wage a spirited and competitive campaign. Your generous support is always appreciated and I look forward to working with you as we campaign through Election Day. Thank you.

Ron Paul Has Already Won

2008-02-12T10:44:00.001-08:00

Ron Paul's bid for the U.S. presidency ranks among the most heroic anyone has ever undertaken. We live in emergency times, with a choice between forms of socialism or fascism. The parties' leadership have embraced this decrepit old model, despite all evidence of the bankruptcy of statism. Ron alone dared pose a challenge. His bid has also been the most unusual in modern history. Its main energy has come not from a political machine, but from millions of volunteers, most of them young and most of them exposed to new political and economic truths for the first time.

read more | digg story

WE WIN!: Ron Paul Bury Brigade Triumphant!

2008-02-09T08:59:00.000-08:00

Here's a message to the gallant souls who have worked so tirelessly to make sure that the Empire will continue from victory to glorious victory 'til all lay prostrate at her feet:

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

Sam Adams, patriot

Looks like the Bury Brigade will soon have the government they deserve....

Some Observations on Four Terms in Congress

2008-02-06T19:52:00.001-08:00

(Before the US House of Representatives, September 19, 1984)Mr. Speaker, I shall be soon leaving the House and have asked for this special order to make a few comments regarding the problems our nation faces and the actions needed to correct them. Having been honored by the 22nd District of Texas to represent them for four terms,

read more | digg story

House Says Ron Paul Again Set to Return Thousands to Treasury

2008-01-13T21:21:00.001-08:00

“Since my first year in Congress representing the 14th district I have managed my office in a frugal manner, instructing staff to provide the greatest possible service to the people of the 14th district at the least possible cost to taxpayers,” said Ron Paul.

read more | digg story

Ron Paul's Loyal Student Surrogates

2008-01-02T19:01:00.001-08:00

Beyond just being polite, the Paul volunteers have an incredible passion for the technical mechanics of the American constitution and body of laws. As I spend time with them, I start to think: I wouldn't want a repairman working on my car who didn't know how it was put together, so why not the same with people who work on my government?

read more | digg story

Huckabee: Of Course He's a Fascist

2007-12-19T18:59:00.001-08:00

The gang at Fox & Friends was happily engaged in their familiar morning routine when one of them made the mistake of asking Rep. Ron Paul about a campaign ad produced by a rival presidential aspirant, Mike Huckabee.

read more | digg story

Huckabee: If You Don’t Give, I’ll Tax it Out of You

2007-12-18T10:20:00.000-08:00

For how long will the Huckabee illusion continue? Right off the top: I think Mike Huckabee would be an absolute disaster as a nominee…and as president in the highly unlikely event he were elected. There are a number of reasons, but I will cover only one here…and it's not his obnoxious Christianeering*, but it is closely linked. Truth is, Huckabee has a history, including in statements on his campaign website right now, that shows he's a reflexive tax-hiker at heart and doesn't seem to have met a tax increase he can't rationalize.

Most of you have probably read this 1998 article as it has been the Drudge headline most of the day today.

"I'm often asked why taxes are so high and government is so big. It's because the faith we have in local churches has become so small. If we'd been doing what we should have — giving a dime from every dollar to help the widows, the orphans and the poor — we now wouldn't be giving nearly 50 cents of every dollar to a government that's doing … what we should have been doing all along."

Talk about swapping the chicken and the egg here! Sorry to use cliches in consecutive sentences, but Huckster was barking up the wrong tree as well.

First, the relationship between government intrusion in the social sector and the rate of charitable giving is this: it is BECAUSE government usurped the traditional social service role that more people came to depend on the state, with a concomitant reduction in community-based solutions to social ills. When government recedes in these areas, when pockets are picked less, charity increases.

Contrary to the tired "Decade of Greed" meme, the Reagan tax cuts led to a doubling in charitable giving (Note: look at the raw numbershere, Philanthropy.com, a lefty-run outfit, attempts to minimize the impact of Reagan tax policy).

Second, he is scolding the WRONG bunch. I'm used to such accusations from Jim Wallis (the Bible-waving socialist who regularly accuses conservative Christians of acting "unbiblically" and of "betraying Jesus") and Tony Campolo ("you can be Christian and care about the poor"), but not from someone trying to appeal to people who actually take Scripture to be more than a tool to advance a socialist agenda.

The fact is conservative Christians DO care about the poor and they actually do something about it…like give to charity. Conservative people of faith give more of their own money and time to charity than any other group, including Christian Leftists. Arthur Brooks compiled the bullet-proof truth in his book "Who Really Cares."

Here's the point. Huckabee, in this statement and in others, sees the government as Big Savior who fills the "need" when the flock "falls short." His default isn't, "Hey maybe the fact that government stuck its nose in the peoples' business in the first place led to a fluctuation in wasteful, redundant and decidedly failed public programs and a reduction in community solutions." No, Huckabee blames the very people who have and still do give more to the community than anyone else for failing and for the "necessity" of Big Savior's cold, bureaucratic and expensive infiltration.

The reason that this 1998 article is relevant today is that in the decade since, Huckabee continued to skip out on mandatory Sowell 101 classes and instead polished his resume as a tax hound. His own "Truth Squad" answers to Club For Growth and CATO shine the light on his "taxes are frequently the answer" form of, er, leadership.

First, I have to point out, he refers to CFG as "Club for Greed" and “anti-tax radicals.” (Kind of like when he referred to border enforcement and employer sanctions supporters as bigots…pattern?) He is maddeningly insistent that the only way to “cover budget shortfalls” is to raise taxes, using the state balanced budget amendment as thin cover for this claim. Time and time again, it has been shown that REDUCING taxes increases prosperity, reduces the inclination to hide income and therefore contributes to increased receipts to the treasury. So his, “what else was I supposed to do” argument rings hollow and shallow. Not only is the use of the state’s balanced budget amendment a pretty cheap juke, his statement that “90% of the state's budget is spent on education, Medicare, prisons, and human services” sets off MAJOR alarm bells, as if there was no opportunity to cut wasteful spending in those areas or reform the “human services” (Code Word Alert: welfare) to bring the budget in line.

He ends up going Clinton Postal in his "clarifying questions" for CFG section. I'll sum it up: You hate kids, you hate sick and old people, you think bridges should fall, etc. if you question my record during a presidential campaign and if you answer any way other than the choices we’ve given you. Again, he implies here that the only way to fix a welfare-packed budget shortfall is to raise taxes, so whatever other explanation he has for other fiscal policies needs to be considered through that prism.

I wish I had the time and was delusional enough to think that anyone has actually read to to this point…but neither is the case, so I'll wrap it up. Bottom line for Huckabee is that he can find a million good reasons to raise taxes, he blames the people least responsible for the "necessity" of government intrusion (the very same people he's playing Jedi Mind Trick on), he'll name-call whenever someone has a different opinion and, dad-gummit, he's doing it all as the [one and only] "Christian Leader" in the race. See, his policies regarding taxes and "helping" the poor are the proper Christian policies and if you are not feeling sufficiently tithey he'll make sure he gets it through the tax man. Render unto Caesar what is God's…that's how it goes right?

*I don't doubt Huckabee's sincerity as a believer and obviously his "vote for me because I'm a Christian" strategy is working pretty well right now (at the same time feeding the myth that Evangelicals are dolts who will simply follow a co-religionist if he can deliver a revival-tent stemwinder…he can). However, unlike faith-centered candidates like Reagan and Bush 43, it seems to be all he's got and he'll go to that one well until he's sucking magma from the ground below it.

PS — his support for the Fair Tax is pretty meaningless in that he KNOWS it doesn't have a chance. Cynical yes, but I have a feeling his support for the Fair Tax is a smoke-screen to obscure his lack of a realistic tax refrom plan. We've seen what Gov. Huck will do when there is a "budget shortfall." It's spelled T-A-X and he continues to toot that trumpet. So how can we trust him to act differently as president?

Original post by Glib Fortuna, 12/10/2007

http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/10/huckabee-if-you-dont-give-ill-tax-it-out-of-you/

Bombed If You Do, Bombed If You Don't

2007-12-11T18:14:00.001-08:00

It is unthinkable that despite lack of any evidence of a threat, some are still charging headstrong into yet another war in the Middle East when what we ought to be doing is coming home from Iraq, coming home from Korea, coming home from Germany and defending our own soil. We do not need to be interfering in the internal affairs of other countries and waging war when honest trade, friendship, and diplomacy are the true paths to peace and prosperity.

read more | digg story

Imperialism Isn't Fun When The Enemy Can Shoot Back

2007-12-09T21:23:00.001-08:00

“We do not want the Filipinos. We want the Philippines. The islands are very rich, but unfortunately they are infested with Filipinos. There are many millions, there and, it is to be feared their extinction will be slow."

read more | digg story

Please Ignore Ron Paul.

2007-12-04T19:18:00.001-08:00

An Open letter to ‘Old Media’ to please continue to ignore Republican Candidate Ron Paul.

read more | digg story

Barry Goldwater Predicts Ron Paul

2007-11-29T10:32:00.001-08:00

"The turn will come when we entrust the conduct of our affairs to the men who understand that their first duty as public officials is to divest themselves of the power that they have been given. It will come when Americans, in hundreds of communities throughout the nation, decide to put the man in office who is pledged to enforce the Constitution."

read more | digg story

An Open Letter to Orthodox Christians, on Behalf of Ron Paul

2007-11-27T23:09:00.001-08:00

I have never contributed to a presidential campaign before. I have never put a political bumper sticker on my car before. And I have never written a letter like this before. I have done all three because for the first time in my life I truly believe that there is a chance to return this nation to the rule of law under the Constitution.

read more | digg story

Monopoly "Money" vs the Liberty Dollar - Will Grigg

2007-11-20T13:34:00.001-08:00

Critics of the Liberty Dollar sometimes describe it as the equivalent of Monopoly money, because it's not backed by the "full faith and credit" of the Regime. The inescapable truth is that the dollar is an instrument of force and fraud, and the Feds claim a monopoly on the same, it is the federal "dollar" that is best described as monopoly "money."

read more | digg story

Ron Paul Wins Nationwide Zogby Blind Poll

2007-11-19T21:10:00.001-08:00

A new nationwide Zogby telephone poll reveals that a sizeable majority of Americans are looking to vote for a candidate who protects liberty, wants to shrink government and immediately withdraw troops from Iraq - all traits common to Texas Congressman Ron Paul.

read more | digg story

A Non-Voter’s Thoughts on Ron Paul

2007-11-15T15:54:00.001-08:00

The truth is, I never was a "principled" non-voter. I’ve always said – jokingly of course – that if a candidate came along who promised to drastically reduce the scope of government, and I trusted them to do so, and that person actually had a shot at winning, I would have to consider voting for that person. Not surprisingly, I have never been faced with this particular dilemma. I suspect that I am not alone among lifetime non-voters who have never really had to examine their stance. As long as there is clearly no point in voting, we are never really forced to dig deeply into the reasons why we don’t vote. And, certainly in my lifetime, there has never been any point in voting in a presidential election. Until now.

read more | digg story

What's So "Sinister" About "Liberty, Prosperity, and Peace"? Will Grigg

2007-11-11T14:20:00.001-08:00

Write this down in ink: Ron Paul, who harbors no detectable rancor toward anyone of woman born and goes to exceptional lengths to treat everyone with respect, will be smeared as a “hater.” This is chiefly because of the genuine hatred – born out of fear – he inspires in many who have made their peace with the Power Elite.

read more | digg story

Christians should support Constitutional government

2007-10-29T21:46:00.001-07:00

by Pastor Chuck Baldwin - Daniel Webster is regarded as perhaps America's most notable jurist. Webster said, "Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has happened once in 6000 years may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world."

read more | digg story

The Dividing Line: HR 3835, The "American Freedom Agenda Act" - Will Grigg

2007-10-21T15:08:00.001-07:00

It really is this simple: Members of Congress either support the Constitution -- including all of that troublesome stuff dealing with checks and balances and non-negotiable guarantees of individual rights -- or they support some form of executive dictatorship. Ron Paul introduced H.R. 3835, the "American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007". Let's find out who supports which form of governance....

read more | digg story

Briefly Considered: A Prediction Partially Fulfilled - Will Grigg

2007-10-17T20:21:00.001-07:00

(T)he grim, unyielding reality is that Ron Paul -- a man who is Christian to his chromosomes, and loves freedom with every molecule of his being -- is disqualified in the eyes of Jones and his ilk for theological reasons: The God Ron Paul serves is Jesus Christ, Prince of Peace and Sovereign Lord of all creation, not the supposedly almighty State.

read more | digg story

Briefly Considered: A Prediction Partially Fulfilled - Will Grigg

2007-10-17T20:07:00.001-07:00

Misunderestimating Ron Paul's Support

2007-10-01T21:57:00.001-07:00

Rick Fisk on what the neocons and the media are about to learn.

read more | digg story

Bush Seals His Betrayal of the Religious Right

2007-09-20T16:35:00.001-07:00

You don’t have to be pro-life to marvel at the breadth and depth of the betrayal that Bush has delivered to his base on the "religious right." Even from a distance, it is as revolting as it is revealing. The palpable cynicism and contempt of Bush now brilliantly shines through, while the neocons chortle all the way to the arms bazaar.

read more | digg story

"These Are MY Sons!"

2007-09-19T19:21:00.000-07:00

Excellent piece by Will Grigg about the classic film 'Shenandoah' and against state slavery.

FTA: "I would kill any member of any armed gang who would violate the sanctity of my home for the purpose of abducting one of our children. It doesn't matter what exalted title he would possess, or what tricked-out gang colors that gang-banger would wear. That principle, as John Locke would say, applies equally to both private sector gangs and those who operate under the supposed authority of the state.

It's quite simple: If you threaten my kids, I'll hurt you. If you try to kidnap them from me, I'll kill you. Capice?"

Read the full article HERE

The Ron Paul epiphany

2007-09-11T14:43:00.001-07:00

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

read more | digg story

Ron Paul people give what money can't buy...

2007-09-11T09:27:00.001-07:00

Ron Paul supporters are spontaneously coming up with stuff like this constantly! Great video!

read more | digg story

Anti-Americans Are Everywhere

2007-09-10T15:29:00.001-07:00

State Senator Robert Clegg calls Ron Paul "anti-American" for opposing the foreign policy of a small group of people in Washington. (The rest of America doesn't count -- the 35 people who make the policy are America, so no questioning them.) Here are what some Republicans were saying about U.S. military operations in Bosnia in 1995. I'm inclined to think they escaped Mr. Clegg's censure.

read more | digg story

Ron Paul Is in a Class By Himself

2007-09-06T19:48:00.001-07:00

"After watching last night's GOP debate, I realized that the two major parties really are Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum. Each candidate in one party has a doppelganger in the other, with one notable exception." Guess who?

read more | digg story

Best interview ABOUT Dr. Paul, ever!

2007-08-27T08:20:00.001-07:00

Yesterday Scott Horton interviewed Lew Rockwell for Antiwar Radio about Ron Paul. (29 minutes). Worth every second! Inspiring!

read more | digg story

That Ron Paul Bash

2007-08-27T07:03:00.001-07:00

"Of course, we know Dr. Paul believes. We know he will live it. And we know he cannot be bought, swayed or moved from his, and our, goal - restoring the Constitution, the republic and our liberties. God speed, Dr. Paul."

read more | digg story

America's Pastors: Preachers of Truth or Promoters of Tyranny?

2007-08-23T14:08:00.001-07:00

A startling television news report from Shreveport, Louisiana has revealed a sinister plot hatched deep inside the diabolical brain cells of the Bush administration to use America s pulpits as promoters of tyranny. That is a strong statement, I know. But it is true.

read more | digg story

Ten Reasons Why Ron Paul Can’t Win

2007-08-21T20:28:00.001-07:00

10. Ron Paul is too popular among people who know where he stands.9. He’s got too much money, and nowhere to spend it.8. Ron Paul is cheating by harnessing the fervor of an army of volunteers,7. Ron Paul tells the truth.6. He’s for lower spending AND lower taxes.5. Ron Paul is a man of principle.4. Ron Paul has peaked.

read more | digg story

What do Ron Paul's numbers mean?

2007-08-19T16:55:00.001-07:00

"(A)s I've said before, the MSM should base their degree of coverage on objective, scientific factors such as contributions, crowds and straw polls."

read more | digg story

Ron Paul : When in the course of human events...

2007-08-15T21:01:00.001-07:00

The videos just keep getting better.....

The Decline & Fall of the Southern Baptists

2007-08-13T15:08:00.001-07:00

The events of September 11, 2001, apparently "changed everything." Yet, after the fiasco that is the war in Iraq has been scrupulously exposed many times over, no change in opinion has been forthcoming from the SBC. Instead, the man most responsible for the war is welcomed with applause and ovation.

read more | digg story

Having Fun Doing Good

2007-08-12T17:26:00.001-07:00

"The sense of urgency on the part of Paul’s supporters comes not just from his message, and not just from his honesty and integrity – qualities even his opponents usually concede. It comes from a sense that this may be our last chance. After Ron Paul there is only a line of hacks as far as the eye can see. We may never see his like again, and we may never have such an opportunity again.We have a man who tells the truth, who – gasp – answers the questions posed to him. We have someone who doesn’t feed us the same old lies about war and empire. And we have someone who cannot be bought, period. Some candidates promise us all kinds of goodies, paid for by looting our neighbor – or by looting us, in the form of inflation. Ron Paul makes no such promises. He promises only peace and freedom, the radical yet common-sense message that neither party can get right."

read more | digg story

From Grassroots Great Things Grow

2007-08-09T21:59:00.001-07:00

A look at one example of the power of grassroots organizing in the 2008 presidential election.

read more | digg story

Running on Angry

2007-08-09T20:14:00.001-07:00

The Surprising Popularity of Republican Ron Paul

read more | digg story

Day Zero a feature film

2007-08-09T11:30:00.001-07:00

The U.S. military draft is back. You have thirty days to report. What would you do?

read more | digg story

We’re All Neocons Now... Except Ron Paul, thankfully

2007-08-07T15:14:00.001-07:00

Max (Stomping on a Human Face, Forever) Boot avers that all the candidates that matter, both Demolican & Republicrat, are in essential agreement with Emperor Bush on interventionism. They're all warmongers now, save for the good Doctor...

read more | digg story

2008: Hillary Clinton vs. Ron Paul?

2007-08-06T21:35:00.001-07:00

The strongest Democrat is Hillary Clinton, arguably the biggest insider to run for office in years. And the candidate with the most vibrant netroots backing is a Republican, Ron Paul. What if? Scroll down to cast your vote!

read more | digg story

Congressman Ron Paul's Secret Revealed

2007-08-04T18:19:00.001-07:00

The secret behind Ron Paul's enthusiastic supporters -- his principles and his personal integrity.

read more | digg story

Ron Paul - Fusion Candidate

2007-08-01T14:56:00.001-07:00

John Derbyshire is wrong to resist the Ron Paul Temptation. Embrace it. Embrace it: conservatives, libertarians, pro-lifers…Right-minded Americans, all.

read more | digg story

Ron Paul vs the Empire

2007-07-31T10:07:00.001-07:00

When evaluating Ron Paul's chances, it’s important to accept one fact about contemporary America: This is not a democracy, and certainly not a constitutional republic. America is actually a carefully concealed oligarchy. A few thousand people, mostly in government, finance, and the military-industrial complex, run this country for their own purposes....

read more | digg story

Ron Paul in San Antonio!

2007-07-29T20:02:00.001-07:00

This is one loud crowd. They don't like George Snuffleupagus very much either!

read more | digg story

Once upon a time, I believed...

2007-07-25T20:22:00.001-07:00

The Iraq war ‘shatters the illusions’ of a Neocon. Having seen that light, perhaps he would like to investigate the stance of Dr. Ron Paul!

read more | digg story

Dr. Ron Paul's Statement of Faith

2007-07-21T21:17:00.001-07:00

"I have never been one who is comfortable talking about my faith in the political arena. In fact, the pandering that typically occurs in the election season I find to be distasteful. But for those who have asked, I freely confess that Jesus Christ is my personal Savior, and that I seek His guidance in all that I do."

read more | digg story

How The News Works by Tom Tomorrow (PIC)

2007-07-20T19:27:00.001-07:00

IRAN IS SCARIEST MENACE IN HISTORY OF SCARY MENACES!!!!

read more | digg story

A Soldier Reflects

2007-07-15T21:13:00.001-07:00

"I served my tour in Iraq after it was clear the WMD would never be found and stood by my helicopter and saluted with tears in my eyes as the body bags containing the remains of my fellow GI's (some weighing less than 30 pounds) were loaded."

read more | digg story

Ron Paul Changes Minds

2007-07-15T20:11:00.001-07:00

"There were tough questions from the host and also from the audience, but not a single groan at the answers. Now we see why Ron Paul will succeed. He is, and his 'message' is, extraordinarily persuasive."

read more | digg story

Rudy’s New Foreign Policy Posse

2007-07-14T18:41:00.001-07:00

Norman Podhoretz advocates "simplistic military solutions to solve what are complex and multifaceted international problems." Should fit right in!

read more | digg story

Soldiers Share the Devastating Tales of War

2007-07-10T14:56:00.001-07:00

"I have PTSD. I know when I got it -- the night I killed an 8-year-old girl. Her family was trying to cross a checkpoint. We'd just shot three guys who'd tried to run a checkpoint. And during that mess, they were just trying to get through to get away from it all. And we ended up shooting all them, too. It was a family of six. The only one that survived was a 13-month-old and her mother. And the worst part about it all was that where I shot my bullets, when I went to see what I'd shot at, there was an 8-year-old girl there. I tried my best to bring her back to life, but there was no use. But that's what triggered my depression."

read more | digg story

100,000 Trees need to be planted to offset effects of Live Earth

2007-07-08T13:28:00.001-07:00

THIS IS NOT A SPOOF! Live Earth will produce about 74,500 tons of the gas. "We would have to plant 100,000 trees to offset the effect of Live Earth," he said, speaking by telephone. But, he added, "if you can reach 2 billion people and raise awareness, that's pretty fantastic." The tree-hugging goofballs need to get busy!

read more | digg story

Party Hacks, Propagandists and Apologists

2007-07-07T21:25:00.001-07:00

"It is obvious that the historian must not be biased by any prejudices and party tenets. Those writers who consider historical events as an arsenal of weapons for the conduct of their party feuds are not historians but propagandists and apologists. They are not eager to acquire knowledge but to justify the program of their parties . . . . They usurp the name of history for their writings as a blind in order to deceive the incredulous."

read more | digg story

DEFENSE AND OTHER LIES by Joe Sobran

2007-07-02T11:16:00.001-07:00

"The most unequal fight of all is the fight to the death between the abortionist and his tiny quarry. The abortionist usually wins. But it isn't polite to say he kills anyone, or anything, no matter how it looks; he terminates a pregnancy, or gives a woman reproductive freedom, or choice, or a certain procedure, or whatever. It's regarded as especially poor taste to show pictures of the result, which might give the impression that "baby-killing" is an accurate term for it."

read more | digg story

Neoconservative radicalism has reshaped our political spectrum

2007-07-01T13:30:00.001-07:00

"The central tenets of the right wing (neoconservative) movement in this country -- which has seized and now defines the term "conservative" -- are easy to see. They're right there in plain sight -- they want to expand government power in pursuit of mindless, bloodthirsty warmongering and empire-building abroad, and the accompanying liberty-infringement at home."

read more | digg story

Dick 'Big Brother' Cheney

2007-06-30T19:39:00.001-07:00

had_enough,
originally uploaded by rab_fw.

Had about enough of Big Brother? My take on a scene from the film '1984' featuring John Hurt, Richard Burton and.....%#*^!.. Dick Cheney?

Identifying With the State

2007-06-29T16:08:00.001-07:00

"Our politico-centric pain and suffering has been brought about by our having allowed external forces to move in and occupy the vacuum we created at the center of our being. The only way out of our dilemma involves a retracing of the route that brought us to where we are."

read more | digg story

Conservatives Must Oppose Militarism and War

2007-06-27T10:52:00.001-07:00

"(T)he military cannot rightfully be considered a proper tool for forging a world where liberty and democracy may flourish. Such notions are hideously liberal, for they are based on the most dangerous of utopian delusions: that men can be made at gunpoint to change; that nations can be built as easily as destroyed; that societies are artificial rather than organic and can be made to order. These ideas have none of the realism that distinguishes conservatism from dreamy liberal mush."

read more | digg story

Ron Paul: Lone Star

2007-06-24T19:48:00.000-07:00

"(W)e have one man who... fights for the Republic, not the Empire."

Read the article here

Goodbye and Good Luck, by Charley Reese

2007-06-23T14:43:00.001-07:00

"The American people have been conned into accepting the idea of an empire, when there is no need for one.... The imperialists have created the illusion that we are in control of the world and if we weren't, everything would fall apart."

read more | digg story

The Martyr of Mosul, Pat Buchanan

2007-06-22T16:27:00.001-07:00

"For the martyrdom of Christianity in its birth cradle, blame must fall heavily upon the men who conceived this misbegotten war."

read more | digg story

Phantom Politics, Dr. Clyde Wilson

2007-06-21T17:55:00.001-07:00

"Many Americans are dumb enough to believe that they are “defending their country” by attacking a foreign people that have done them no harm and pose them no threat. Defending one’s country has been turned into a phantom unanchored in reality."

read more | digg story

Have We Forgotten 2003 Already?

2007-06-21T14:07:00.001-07:00

"Clearly, language threatening to wipe a nation or a group of people off the map is to be condemned by all civilized people. And I do condemn any such language. But why does threatening Iran with a pre-emptive nuclear strike, as many here have done, not also deserve the same kind of condemnation? Does anyone believe that dropping nuclear weapons on Iran will not wipe a people off the map? When it is said that nothing, including a nuclear strike, is off the table on Iran, are those who say it not also threatening genocide? And we wonder why the rest of the world accuses us of behaving hypocritically, of telling the rest of the world “do as we say, not as we do.”"

read more | digg story

We Are All Potentially Enemy Combatants

2007-06-21T12:56:00.001-07:00

"In a world where the president has the power to label anyone, whether a citizen or permanent resident, an enemy combatant and detain that person indefinitely without trial, no liberty exists and everyone is potentially an “enemy combatant.”"

read more | digg story

Wanted: A New Conservatism

2007-06-18T13:17:00.001-07:00

In recent weeks Will has all but endorsed Rudy Giuliani (whom else?) for president and ridiculed Ron Paul, who takes the U.S. Constitution seriously, as an anachronism. I imagine he slapped his flippers together in glee when Giuliani attacked Paul for saying the obvious, that the 9/11 attacks were motivated by American foreign policy, rather than by virginal American innocence. Paul might have been speaking for Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton, men to whom Giuliani would have little to say, unless he could say it with his middle finger.

read more | digg story

Foreign Policy Socialists of the GOP

2007-06-18T10:10:00.001-07:00

As Ron Paul says the Republican party truly has lost it’s way… So called conservatives tend to agree that socialism doesn’t work, though the mainstream GOP has been turning more socialist everyday and this is especially true with regard to foreign policy. Let’s look at the basis for the anti-socialism argument as a starting point...

read more | digg story

Lying Us Into War, Again

2007-06-17T21:29:00.001-07:00

"Sen. Joe Lieberman, who seems to be one of those who loves war as long as he doesn't have to fight it, really believes that we can attack Iran without Iranian retaliation, then he's naive. If he knows better, he's a liar, and to lie the American people into a second war before the other lied-into war in Iraq is even over is despicable. He should be shunned by all decent people."

read more | digg story

We Have Always Been At War With Eastasia...

2007-06-17T20:23:00.001-07:00

Fred Kaplan, writing in Slate, opines:“It’s time to start thinking cold-bloodedly about what we might yet eke out of Iraq. An intriguing possibility is on display in Anbar province, where U.S. troops have formed an alliance with Sunni insurgents for the common purpose of killing al-Qaida jihadists.“These insurgents were killing American soldiers just a few months ago. They may resume doing so, once this operation is complete. Such is the nature of coalition warfare, especially when our original coalition partners have largely pulled out of the war.”I’ve been saving this link for the proper occasion, and it looks like I’ve found it. Yes, we have always been at war with Eastasia. Isn’t that right, comrade?

read more | digg story

Will YOUR candidate sign this pledge?

2007-06-15T15:53:00.000-07:00

It will be interesting to see which Presidential candidates will sign the Freedom Pledge produced by The American Freedom Agenda. All that it would require would be a willingness to uphold the oath they will take once elected to uphold and defend the Constitution.

The stalwart conservatives behind this project are Bruce Fein, Bob Barr, Richard Viguerie, and David Keene.

One Presidential candidate has already signed this document. Dr. Ron Paul. I wonder who else will state unequivocally that the oath they take means something to them? Who else will bind him or her self with the strong cords of the Constitution? We'll see.

Here's the pledge:

Freedom Pledge

I, (candidate), hereby pledge that if elected President of the United States I will undertake the following to restore the Constitution’s checks and balances, to honor fundamental protections against injustice, and to eschew usurpations of legislative or judicial power.These are keystones of national security and individual freedom:

1. No Military Commissions Except on the Battlefield. I will not employ military commissions to prosecute offenses against the laws of war except in places where active hostilities are ongoing and a battlefield tribunal is necessary to obtain fresh testimony and to prevent local anarchy or chaos.

2. No Evidence Extracted by Torture or Coercion. I will not permit the use of evidence obtained by torture or coercion to be admissible in a military commission or other tribunal.

3. No Detaining Citizens as Unlawful Enemy Combatants. I will not detain any American citizen as an unlawful enemy combatant. Citizens accused of terrorism-linked crimes will be prosecuted in federal civilian courts.

4. Restoring Habeas Corpus for Suspected Alien Enemy Combatants. I will detain non-citizens as enemy combatants only if they have actively participated in actual hostilities against the United States. I will urge Congress to amend the Military Commissions Act of 2006 to permit any individual detained under the custody or control of the United States government to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal courts.

5. Prohibiting Warrantless Spying by the National Security Agency in Violation of Law. I will prohibit the National Security Agency from gathering foreign intelligence except in conformity with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and end the NSA’s domestic surveillance program that targets American citizens on American soil for warrantless electronic surveillance.

6. Renouncing Presidential Signing Statements. I will not issue presidential signing statements declaring the intent to disregard provisions of a bill that I have signed into law because I believe they are unconstitutional. Instead, I will veto any bill that I believe contains an unconstitutional provision and ask Congress to delete it and re-pass the legislation.

7. Ending Secret Government by Invoking State Secrets Privilege. I will not invoke the state secrets privilege to deny remedies to individuals victimized by constitutional violations perpetrated by government officials or agents. I will not assert executive privilege to deny Congress information relevant to oversight or legislation unless supreme state secrets are involved. In that case, I will submit the privilege claim to a legislative-executive committee for definitive resolution.

8. Stopping Extraordinary Renditions. I will order the cessation of extraordinary renditions except where the purpose of the capture and transportation of the suspected criminal is for prosecution according to internationally accepted standards of fairness and due process.

9. Stopping Threats to Prosecuting Journalists under the Espionage Act. I will urge Congress to amend the Espionage Act to create a journalistic exception for reporting on matters relating to the national defense. As a matter of prosecutorial discretion, until such an amendment is enacted I will not prosecute journalists for alleged Espionage Act violations except for the intentional disclosure of information that threatens immediate physical harm to American troops or citizens at home or abroad.

10. Ending the Listing of Individuals or Organizations as Terrorists Based on Secret Evidence. I will not list individuals or organizations as foreign terrorists or foreign terrorist organizations for purposes of United States or international law based on secret evidence.

I will issue a public report annually elaborating on how the actions enumerated in paragraphs 1-10 have strengthened the ability of the United States to defeat international terrorism, secure fundamental freedoms, and preserve the nation’s democratic dispensation.

___________________________

(Candidate)

Date: ______________________

The Interventionist-Internationalist Complex

2007-06-13T20:51:00.001-07:00

CFR members who are running for President (or considering doing so):Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Jim Gilmore, Newt Gingrich, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, Bill Richardson. Guess who's missing from this list?

read more | digg story

Post–Constitutional America

2007-06-11T12:27:00.001-07:00

(T)he time is ripe for a constitutional counterrevolution. Discontent with the ruling system... is deep and widespread among several classes of people: Christians, conservatives, gun owners, taxpayers, and simple believers in honest government all have their reasons. The rulers lack legitimacy and don’t believe in their own power strongly enough to defend it.The beauty of it is that the people don’t have to invent a new system of government in order to get rid of this one. They only have to restore the one described in the Constitution — the system our government already professes to be upholding. Taken seriously, the Constitution would pose a serious threat to our form of government.

read more | digg story

American Idols

2007-06-11T09:01:00.001-07:00

"A tolerant fellow Christian just told me he thinks atheists are entitled to their opinions. I told him I think they're entitled to my opinions; I've heard enough of theirs! Don't even get me started on the subject of that fool Darwin. The world would be a lot better off if he'd taken up astrology, like Attila the Hun."

read more | digg story

Smug Neocon Kristol Disses Bush Big Time

2007-06-10T16:46:00.001-07:00

"For President Bush, loyalty is apparently a one-way street; decency is something he’s for as long as he doesn’t have to take any risks in its behalf; and courage – well, that’s nowhere to be seen. Many of us used to respect President Bush. Can one respect him still?” Take that, Dubya!

read more | digg story

The Real Reason for Bush’s Invasion of Iraq Is a National Security Secret

2007-06-09T20:18:00.001-07:00

"What is moral degeneracy if it is not using nuclear weapons to murder masses of innocent civilians and spread deadly radioactivity over vast areas merely in order to force a country to do as we order? If this isn’t barbarism, what is barbarism?"

read more | digg story

Why the Tax Protestors' Movement Cannot Succeed

2007-06-09T17:19:00.001-07:00

"Much tax protester time is spent praying to the Constitution. Big problem. Constitutions don't limit government power because the government has claimed the exclusive right to say what they mean." More important, the public no longer believes in or understands the values that gave rise to the Constitution..."

read more | digg story

Whither the Remnant? by Butler Shaffer

2007-06-07T10:33:00.001-07:00

You do not know and will never know who the Remnant are, or where they are, or how many of them there are, or what they are doing or will do. Two things you know, and no more: first, that they exist; second, that they will find you.~ Albert Jay Nock

read more | digg story

If You Think Bush Is Evil Now, Wait Until He Nukes Iran

2007-06-05T22:10:00.001-07:00

(T)he Democrats have decided that it is easier to be complicit in war crimes than to represent the wishes of the electorate and hold a rogue president accountable. If Cheney again prevails, America will supplant the Third Reich as the most reviled country in recorded history.

read more | digg story

Ron Paul vs. The Christian Right

2007-06-05T20:37:00.001-07:00

Why would the leadership of the Christian Right reject someone who was pro-religion, pro-life, pro-family values, pro-religious liberty, pro-Constitution, and a veteran, who not only was opposed to same-sex marriage, unrestricted immigration, gun control, and the United Nations, but never, in all his years in Congress, voted to raise taxes, took a government-paid junket, or voted for a congressional pay raise?Why?I believe this is due to three things: ignorance, stupidity, and statolatry.

read more | digg story

Big Brother looks familiar....

2007-06-04T22:19:00.000-07:00

Big Brother, Winston & O'Brien

My son, the libertarian.....

2007-06-04T11:33:00.000-07:00

Patrick is 19. Here's what he had to say on his MySpace blog recently. (The numbers indicate YouTube subscriptions per candidate at the time):

Ron Paul ...12,001 -- Wants to restore Bill of Rights and Constitution!
Obama...5,768 -- Did cocaine with Rick James (its In Obama's book)!
Clinton...3,212 -- Talking head for Socialist Elites and Israel. Supports carbon tax!
Romney.2,014 -- Mormon, believes he will be a God one day with many spirit wives!
Giuliani..1,389 -- From crime family, Married his cousin, Divorced 3 times!
McCain..1,259 -- Supports expensive, endless war against a poorly defined enemy "Terrorism"!

Ron Paul has completely ambushed the media and the American public. I first heard of Ron Paul about 4 years ago and he instantly became one of my heroes after I heard a speech he gave on the floor of congress. This was right around the time when I became interested in politics and was becoming fed up with the two parties controlling our lives and the world. I decided I was a libertarian.

About a year ago, my dad came to me announcing to me that Ron Paul was planning on running for president and that he was going to support him as much as he could through bumper stickers and internet blogs. All I could think at the time was "Good luck, Ron Paul's chances are thinner than a strand of hair." So I didn't take it seriously.

Over the past month or so though, things have changed. This old hero of mine from four years ago that no one knew about, that no one cared about, whose ideas were so challenging, is now gaining so much popularity and support in just a matter of 2 weeks, both Republicans and Democrats are fleeing to this Moses-type character because they know he's our only hope for freedom by leading us out of slavery.

I watch these videos on youtube of GOP debates where Ron Paul is ripping it up, fundraising speeches, etc. The response to his ideas (which have been my ideas for the past 4 years) is overwhelming. He's taking everyone by surprise and everyone in the media is talking about him. I seriously have been on the verge of tears to see him giving America some hope to free us from this enslaved corporate-statism that is our bloated, out-of-control government.

You can even go to the videos of the democratic debates and all the coments talk about Ron Paul. His support and following is extraordinary to me, I have never seen this happen to an unknown politician with radical ideas. Yet even with all his support, the corporate-owned government media is trying so hard to hold him back, but Paul continues to prevail and continues to challenge peoples ideas. The extraordinary part is that his ideas are ACTUALLY getting across to people.

4 years ago I argued with so many republicans about the war in Iraq and all the republicans just gave me endless #### about their threat to us. I told them that the war is not just, I told them Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11, I told them 9/11 was the result of bad foreign policy of interventionalism. I told them that no matter what Bush says, things in Iraq will only get worse, and the war will never end or succeed. They thought I was wrong and blindly supported Bush thinking he would prevail. These things never prevail... Over time though, Bush's ratings began to go down, he began losing support as the war continued to rage on with no hope in sight. There's still none... even after 4 years of arguing with republicans.

And now with an election drawing near... a voice comes out of the shadows of the libertarian ideology and is reaching to people as an alternative... and people are actually listening... My shock is that REPUBLICANS... the people I so loathed and hated... are coming to their senses after witnessing Bush's failures. Republican's are showing signs of moving in a new direction AWAY from neo-conservativism and towards constitutional liberty... towards real freedom... real genuine honest to God sacred freedom that we've been missing out on. The freedom I've been wanting for four years and beyond.

There's hope... I know there is. I'm not losing faith in the world and its people...

Under Ron Paul's Presidency, we would have:

-An end to the war in Iraq, our troops from bases all over the world home and safe. No more bloodshed. No more war.
-An end to tyrannical bureacracy: the IRS, the Federal Reserve, the CIA, the FBI, the DEA, virtually all of the Departments.
-A prevention of the REAL ID act, and other Big Brother scams.
-An end to the income tax.
-Social and personal liberty and freedom.
-An end to expensive, dangerous and pointless pursuits such as the War on Drugs
-An end to corporate subsidies and corporate/state sponsorships (corporatism)
-FREE SPEECH!
-A return to the Constitution.

Patrick's blog

My guess is, not a big seller....

2007-06-04T08:44:00.000-07:00

If this is the only bumper sticker you have to sell you'll not last long in the business!

Tolkien v. Power

2007-06-03T18:02:00.001-07:00

The Lord of the Rings is the epic journey to destroy the One Ring, which symbolizes power. More precisely, the book aligns itself against power--not "economic power" or "social power," but specifically political power. This is also the central theme of the classical liberal political tradition.

read more | digg story

Dying for Nothing

2007-06-03T08:57:00.001-07:00

So, if you don't want to say the kids are dying for nothing, you can say they are dying for Halliburton, for ExxonMobil, for the president's ego, for a ########## theory of a bunch of academics, for Israel, for money or for oil. What you cannot truthfully say is that they are dying for freedom.

read more | digg story

Republican Authoritarianism

2007-06-03T07:45:00.001-07:00

Prof. Harvey Mansfield of Harvard, no less, reveals his desire for a king. Thanks for sharing Professor, but I prefer the 'rule of law' and perhaps a Ron Paul presidency to your dictator idea.

read more | digg story

Ron Paul and the Founders versus Our Interventionist Elite

2007-06-03T07:41:00.001-07:00

America’s bipartisan governing elite never expected their common interventionist foreign policy to be damned by a man who has long worked among that august group. But Paul proved himself not only a political maverick, but one of the few elected federal officials who still prizes - indeed, treasures his status as an American citizen.

read more | digg story

2005-07-07T17:22:00.000-07:00

Poster reads: "Long Live Germany!" and employs Biblical imagery of an eagle descending as from Heaven over Germany's supposed savior.

2005-07-04T17:34:00.000-07:00

"God with us" WW1 German postcard

Sand Bar Bridge in Vermont

2005-06-09T05:23:00.000-07:00

Vermont view, 1936 Curteich card

Wallpaper file

2005-06-03T16:28:00.000-07:00

I have started making desktop wallpaper from some of my recent acquisitions.
Today's post is a wallpaper file of an old card of Mission San Diego.
If you would like to see the full-size image (1152x870 pixels) you can
find it at http://www.geocities.com/rab_fw/images/sd1.jpg

2005-06-03T16:25:00.000-07:00

Posted 1909

Thoreau's Cairn

2005-06-01T04:59:00.000-07:00

See image below

2005-06-01T04:45:00.000-07:00

"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation."

2005-05-30T18:27:00.000-07:00

An English Tuck card postmarked 1908 of one of my favorite historical figures Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson.

Going-to-the-Sun

2005-05-29T20:30:00.000-07:00

Linen card from the'40s? below.

2005-05-29T20:26:00.000-07:00

Oregon view

Pictures in the post from the past...

2005-05-29T18:47:00.000-07:00

The older I get, the more I like stuff that is even older than me! In that regard, I have started collecting old postcards. In the days to come I will start posting scans of some of the most interesting of the glimpses into the past.